↓ Skip to main content

Determinants of unintended pregnancies in rural Ghana

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
369 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determinants of unintended pregnancies in rural Ghana
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-261
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Eliason, Frank Baiden, Barbara A Yankey, Kofi Awusabo–Asare

Abstract

Unintended pregnancies may carry serious consequences for women and their families, including the possibility of unsafe abortion, delayed prenatal care, poor maternal mental health and poor child health outcomes. Although between 1993 and 2008, unintended births decreased from 42% to 37% in Ghana, the rate of decline is low, whilst levels are still very high. This raises the need to understand factors associated with unintended pregnancies, especially among women in rural settings where the rates and risks are highest to help improve maternal health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 369 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 365 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 77 21%
Student > Bachelor 53 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 8%
Student > Postgraduate 25 7%
Researcher 22 6%
Other 48 13%
Unknown 113 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 68 18%
Social Sciences 50 14%
Psychology 17 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 121 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2014.
All research outputs
#13,406,143
of 23,337,345 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,452
of 4,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,540
of 231,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#70
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,337,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.