You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The immune mechanism of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae 168 vaccine strain through dendritic cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Veterinary Research, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12917-017-1194-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yumeng Shen, Weiwei Hu, Yanna Wei, Zhixin Feng, Qian Yang |
| Abstract |
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhp) causes porcine enzootic pneumonia, a disease that cause major economic losses in the pig industry. Dendritic cells (DCs), the most effective antigen-presenting cells, are widely distributed beneath respiratory epithelium, DCs uptake and present antigens to T cells, to initiate protective immune responses in different infections. In this study, we investigated the role of porcine DCs in vaccine Mhp-168 exposure. The antigen presenting ability of DCs were improved by vaccine Mhp-168 exposure. DCs could activate T-cell proliferation by up-regulating the antigen presenting molecule MHCII expression and co-stimulatory molecule CD80/86. However, the up-regulation of IL-10 and accompany with down-regulation of IFN-γ gene level may account for the limitation of attenuated Mhp-168 strain use as vaccine alone. These findings are benefit for exploring the protection mechanisms and the possible limitations of this attenuated Mhp-168 vaccine. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 22% |
| Researcher | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 26% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2018.
All research outputs
#14,955,443
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#1,248
of 3,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,457
of 316,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#36
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,065 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.