↓ Skip to main content

Comparative transcriptome profiling of a desert evergreen shrub, Ammopiptanthus mongolicus, in response to drought and cold stresses

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative transcriptome profiling of a desert evergreen shrub, Ammopiptanthus mongolicus, in response to drought and cold stresses
Published in
BMC Genomics, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-671
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yaqi Wu, Wei, Xinyue Pang, Xuefeng Wang, Huiling Zhang, Bo Dong, Yanping Xing, Xinguo Li, Maoyan Wang

Abstract

The molecular mechanisms involved in plant tolerance to either drought or cold have been extensively studied in many plant species. However, few studies have focused on their comparisons especially using non-model plants with strong tolerance to both stresses. Ammopiptanthus mongolicus (Maxim. ex Kom.) Cheng f. is the only evergreen broadleaf shrub grown in the central Asian desert and it has very strong cold and drought tolerance. To provide further insights into plant tolerance, the transcriptome profiles of drought- and cold-treated A. mongolicus seedlings were analyzed using Illumina technology and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were compared.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Linguistics 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 12 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2014.
All research outputs
#3,578,799
of 4,507,778 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,559
of 4,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,348
of 110,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#222
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,113 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.