↓ Skip to main content

The dynamic range of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
patent
11 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The dynamic range of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic breast cancer
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13058-014-0421-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maryam Heidary, Martina Auer, Peter Ulz, Ellen Heitzer, Edgar Petru, Christin Gasch, Sabine Riethdorf, Oliver Mauermann, Ingrid Lafer, Gunda Pristauz, Sigurd Lax, Klaus Pantel, Jochen B Geigl, Michael R Speicher

Abstract

IntroductionThe management of metastatic breast cancer needs improvement. As clinical evaluation is not very accurate in determining the progression of disease, the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has evolved to a promising non-invasive marker of disease evolution. Indeed, ctDNA was reported to represent a highly sensitive biomarker of metastatic cancer disease directly reflecting tumor burden and dynamics. However, at present little is known about the dynamic range of ctDNA in patients with metastatic breast cancer.MethodsIn this study, 74 plasma DNA samples from 58 patients with metastasized breast cancer were analyzed with a microfluidic device to determine the plasma DNA size distribution and copy number changes in the plasma were identified by whole genome sequencing (plasma-Seq). Furthermore, in an index patient we conducted whole genome, exome, or targeted deep sequencing of the primary tumor, metastases, and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Deep-sequencing was done to accurately determine the allele fraction (AFs) of mutated DNA fragments.ResultsAlthough all patients had metastatic disease, plasma analyses demonstrated highly variable AFs of mutant fragments. We analyzed an index patient with more than 100,000 CTCs in detail. We first conducted whole genome, exome, or targeted deep sequencing of four different regions from the primary tumor and three metastatic lymph node regions which enabled us to establish the phylogenetic relationships of these lesions, which were consistent with a genetically homogeneous cancer. Subsequent analyses of 551 CTCs confirmed the genetically homogeneous cancer in three serial blood analyses. However, the AFs of ctDNA were only 2% to 3% in each analysis, neither reflecting the tumor burden nor the dynamics of this progressive disease. These results together with high-resolution plasma DNA fragment sizing suggested that differences in phagocytosis and DNA degradation mechanisms likely explain the variable occurrence of mutated DNA fragments in the blood of patients with cancer.ConclusionsThe dynamic range of ctDNA varies substantially in patients with metastatic breast cancer. This has important implications for the use of ctDNA as a predictive and prognostic biomarker.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 194 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 14%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Other 18 9%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 27 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 22%
Engineering 4 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 33 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,955,328
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#168
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,389
of 242,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#5
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.