↓ Skip to main content

Association of metformin with lower atrial fibrillation risk among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population-based dynamic cohort and in vitro studies

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Diabetology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of metformin with lower atrial fibrillation risk among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population-based dynamic cohort and in vitro studies
Published in
Cardiovascular Diabetology, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12933-014-0123-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shang-Hung Chang, Lung-Sheng Wu, Meng-Jiun Chiou, Jia-Rou Liu, Kuang-Hui Yu, Chang-Fu Kuo, Ming-Shien Wen, Wei-Jan Chen, Yung-Hsin Yeh, Lai-Chu See

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF), an inflammatory process involving arrhythmia, is associated with severe morbidity and mortality and commonly seen in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). The effect of metformin, the most commonly used medication for patients with DM, on AF has not been investigated. The primary aim of this study was to examine whether metformin prevented the occurrence of AF in type 2 DM patients by analyzing a nationwide, population-based dynamic cohort. Additionally, we investigated the effect of metformin on tachycardia-induced myolysis and oxidative stress in atrial cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Other 12 9%
Student > Master 10 8%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 44 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 53 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,504,088
of 23,576,969 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#536
of 1,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,641
of 231,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,576,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.