You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Beneficial effects of inhaled NO on apoptotic pneumocytes in pulmonary thromboembolism model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-4682-11-36 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chaosheng Deng, Minxia Yang, Qichang Lin, Yuanhua Yang, Zhenguo Zhai, Kaixiong Liu, Haibo Ding, Xiaoming Cao, Zhihua Huang, Lina Zhang, Jianming Zhao |
| Abstract |
Lung ischemia-reperfusion injury (LIRI) may occur in the region of the affected lung after reperfusion therapy. Inhaled NO may be useful in treating acute and chronic pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) due to the biological effect property of NO. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2014.
All research outputs
#18,375,478
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#215
of 287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,385
of 230,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.