↓ Skip to main content

Construct and concurrent validity of a patient-reported adverse drug event questionnaire: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Construct and concurrent validity of a patient-reported adverse drug event questionnaire: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12955-014-0103-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sieta T de Vries, Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp, Dick de Zeeuw, Petra Denig

Abstract

Direct patient-reported information about adverse drug events (ADEs) is important since it adds to healthcare professional-reported information about the safety of drugs. Previously, we developed an instrument to assess patient-reported ADEs in research settings. The aim of this study is to assess the construct and concurrent validity of the questionnaire.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2014.
All research outputs
#10,032,239
of 12,538,284 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,087
of 1,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,473
of 193,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,538,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,362 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.