You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Computational analysis identifies a sponge interaction network between long non-coding RNAs and messenger RNAs in human breast cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Systems Biology, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1752-0509-8-83 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paola Paci, Teresa Colombo, Lorenzo Farina |
Abstract |
Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are emerging as key regulators of many cellular processes in both physiological and pathological states. Moreover, the constant discovery of new non-coding RNA species suggests that the study of their complex functions is still in its very early stages. This variegated class of RNA species encompasses the well-known microRNAs (miRNAs) and the most recently acknowledged long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). Interestingly, in the last couple of years, a few studies have shown that some lncRNAs can act as miRNA sponges, i.e. as competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs), able to reduce the amount of miRNAs available to target messenger RNAs (mRNAs). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
Hungary | 2 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 127 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 24% |
Researcher | 22 | 16% |
Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 9% |
Other | 24 | 17% |
Unknown | 19 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 29% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 8% |
Computer Science | 10 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 6% |
Unknown | 22 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2014.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#827
of 1,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,866
of 227,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#18
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.