↓ Skip to main content

Computer-based simulation training in emergency medicine designed in the light of malpractice cases

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computer-based simulation training in emergency medicine designed in the light of malpractice cases
Published in
BMC Medical Education, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-14-155
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akan Karakuş, Latif Duran, Yücel Yavuz, Levent Altintop, Fatih Çalişkan

Abstract

Using computer-based simulation systems in medical education is becoming more and more common. Although the benefits of practicing with these systems in medical education have been demonstrated, advantages of using computer-based simulation in emergency medicine education are less validated. The aim of the present study was to assess the success rates of final year medical students in doing emergency medical treatment and evaluating the effectiveness of computer-based simulation training in improving final year medical students' knowledge.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 33%
Social Sciences 8 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Psychology 4 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 18 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2014.
All research outputs
#9,640,705
of 18,200,159 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,119
of 2,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,562
of 208,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,200,159 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them