You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Computer-based simulation training in emergency medicine designed in the light of malpractice cases
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-155 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Akan Karakuş, Latif Duran, Yücel Yavuz, Levent Altintop, Fatih Çalişkan |
Abstract |
Using computer-based simulation systems in medical education is becoming more and more common. Although the benefits of practicing with these systems in medical education have been demonstrated, advantages of using computer-based simulation in emergency medicine education are less validated. The aim of the present study was to assess the success rates of final year medical students in doing emergency medical treatment and evaluating the effectiveness of computer-based simulation training in improving final year medical students' knowledge. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 69 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 17% |
Unknown | 17 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 32% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
Psychology | 4 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 22 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2014.
All research outputs
#12,587,582
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,418
of 3,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,675
of 229,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#31
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.