↓ Skip to main content

Global warming and malaria: knowing the horse before hitching the cart

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global warming and malaria: knowing the horse before hitching the cart
Published in
Malaria Journal, December 2008
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-7-s1-s3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Reiter

Abstract

Speculations on the potential impact of climate change on human health frequently focus on malaria. Predictions are common that in the coming decades, tens - even hundreds - of millions more cases will occur in regions where the disease is already present, and that transmission will extend to higher latitudes and altitudes. Such predictions, sometimes supported by simple models, are persuasive because they are intuitive, but they sidestep factors that are key to the transmission and epidemiology of the disease: the ecology and behaviour of both humans and vectors, and the immunity of the human population. A holistic view of the natural history of the disease, in the context of these factors and in the precise setting where it is transmitted, is the only valid starting point for assessing the likely significance of future changes in climate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Philippines 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Senegal 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 193 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 16%
Student > Master 32 15%
Researcher 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Other 12 6%
Other 43 20%
Unknown 34 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 16%
Environmental Science 26 12%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 4%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 41 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2024.
All research outputs
#968,935
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#114
of 5,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,210
of 180,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.