↓ Skip to main content

Human papillomavirus prevalence among indigenous and non-indigenous Australian women prior to a national HPV vaccination program

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human papillomavirus prevalence among indigenous and non-indigenous Australian women prior to a national HPV vaccination program
Published in
BMC Medicine, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-9-104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanne M Garland, Julia ML Brotherton, John R Condon, Peter B McIntyre, Matthew P Stevens, David W Smith, Sepehr N Tabrizi, the WHINURS study group

Abstract

Indigenous women in Australia have a disproportionate burden of cervical cancer despite a national cervical screening program. Prior to introduction of a national human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination program, we determined HPV genotype prevalence by Indigenous status and residence in remote areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 108 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 20%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 28 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,096,882
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#765
of 3,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,673
of 128,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.