↓ Skip to main content

Human papillomavirus prevalence among indigenous and non-indigenous Australian women prior to a national HPV vaccination program

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human papillomavirus prevalence among indigenous and non-indigenous Australian women prior to a national HPV vaccination program
Published in
BMC Medicine, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-9-104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanne M Garland, Julia ML Brotherton, John R Condon, Peter B McIntyre, Matthew P Stevens, David W Smith, Sepehr N Tabrizi

Abstract

Indigenous women in Australia have a disproportionate burden of cervical cancer despite a national cervical screening program. Prior to introduction of a national human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination program, we determined HPV genotype prevalence by Indigenous status and residence in remote areas.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Denmark 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 94 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 23%
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 17 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2017.
All research outputs
#443,044
of 12,517,134 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#403
of 2,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,874
of 91,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,517,134 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.