↓ Skip to main content

Early steps of retrovirus replicative cycle

Overview of attention for article published in Retrovirology, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
378 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early steps of retrovirus replicative cycle
Published in
Retrovirology, May 2004
DOI 10.1186/1742-4690-1-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sébastien Nisole, Ali Saïb

Abstract

During the last two decades, the profusion of HIV research due to the urge to identify new therapeutic targets has led to a wealth of information on the retroviral replication cycle. However, while the late stages of the retrovirus life cycle, consisting of virus replication and egress, have been partly unraveled, the early steps remain largely enigmatic. These early steps consist of a long and perilous journey from the cell surface to the nucleus where the proviral DNA integrates into the host genome. Retroviral particles must bind specifically to their target cells, cross the plasma membrane, reverse-transcribe their RNA genome, while uncoating the cores, find their way to the nuclear membrane and penetrate into the nucleus to finally dock and integrate into the cellular genome. Along this journey, retroviruses hijack the cellular machinery, while at the same time counteracting cellular defenses. Elucidating these mechanisms and identifying which cellular factors are exploited by the retroviruses and which hinder their life cycle, will certainly lead to the discovery of new ways to inhibit viral replication and to improve retroviral vectors for gene transfer. Finally, as proven by many examples in the past, progresses in retrovirology will undoubtedly also provide some priceless insights into cell biology.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Brazil 3 <1%
India 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 359 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 67 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 17%
Student > Master 64 17%
Researcher 49 13%
Student > Postgraduate 18 5%
Other 46 12%
Unknown 69 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 127 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 78 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 28 7%
Chemistry 12 3%
Other 27 7%
Unknown 71 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,313,730
of 25,506,250 outputs
Outputs from Retrovirology
#442
of 1,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,747
of 63,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Retrovirology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,506,250 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.