↓ Skip to main content

Relating therapy for voices (the R2V study): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relating therapy for voices (the R2V study): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-325
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Hayward, Clara Strauss, Leanne Bogen-Johnston

Abstract

Evidence exists for the effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis with moderate effect sizes, but the evidence for cognitive behaviour therapy specifically for distressing voices is less convincing. An alternative symptom-based approach may be warranted and a body of literature has explored distressing voices from an interpersonal perspective. This literature has informed the development of relating therapy and findings from a case series suggested that this intervention was acceptable to hearers and therapists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 20 32%