You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metabolite profiling of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) phloem exudate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-10-27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lachlan James Palmer, Daniel Anthony Dias, Berin Boughton, Ute Roessner, Robin David Graham, JamesConstantine Roy Stangoulis |
| Abstract |
Biofortification of staple crops with essential micronutrients relies on the efficient, long distance transport of nutrients to the developing seed. The main route of this transport in common wheat (Triticum aestivum) is via the phloem, but due to the reactive nature of some essential micronutrients (specifically Fe and Zn), they need to form ligands with metabolites for transport within the phloem. Current methods available in collecting phloem exudate allows for small volumes (μL or nL) to be collected which limits the breadth of metabolite analysis. We present a technical advance in the measurement of 79 metabolites in as little as 19.5 nL of phloem exudate. This was achieved by using mass spectrometry based, metabolomic techniques. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Mexico | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 99 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 24% |
| Researcher | 24 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2014.
All research outputs
#8,186,806
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#532
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,616
of 243,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.