↓ Skip to main content

Multiple chimeric antigen receptors successfully target chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 in several different cancer histologies and cancer stem cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiple chimeric antigen receptors successfully target chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 in several different cancer histologies and cancer stem cells
Published in
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/2051-1426-2-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel E Beard, Zhili Zheng, Kiran H Lagisetty, William R Burns, Eric Tran, Stephen M Hewitt, Daniel Abate-Daga, Shannon F Rosati, Howard A Fine, Soldano Ferrone, Steven A Rosenberg, Richard A Morgan

Abstract

The development of immunotherapy has led to significant progress in the treatment of metastatic cancer, including the development of genetic engineering technologies that redirect lymphocytes to recognize and target a wide variety of tumor antigens. Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) are hybrid proteins combining antibody recognition domains linked to T cell signaling elements. Clinical trials of CAR-transduced peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) have induced remission of both solid organ and hematologic malignancies. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4) is a promising target antigen that is overexpressed in multiple cancer histologies including melanoma, triple-negative breast cancer, glioblastoma, mesothelioma and sarcoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Portugal 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 120 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 30 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 33 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,196,266
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#1,112
of 3,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,980
of 247,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.