You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficacy of antibiotic therapy for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: a proportional meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-14-445 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pasqual Barretti, João Vitor Pereira Doles, Douglas Gonçalves Pinotti, Regina El Dib |
Abstract |
The choice of antimicrobials for initial treatment of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis is crucial for a favorable outcome. There is no consensus about the best therapy; few prospective controlled studies have been published, and the only published systematic reviews did not report superiority of any class of antimicrobials. The objective of this review was to analyze the results of PD peritonitis treatment in adult patients by employing a new methodology, the proportional meta-analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brunei Darussalam | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 18% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
Researcher | 8 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Other | 18 | 23% |
Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 52% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2014.
All research outputs
#16,962,098
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,782
of 8,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,921
of 247,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#95
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.