You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and evaluation of a new survey instrument to measure the quality of colorectal cancer screening decisions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-14-72 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen R Sepucha, Sandra Feibelmann, Carol Cosenza, Carrie A Levin, Michael Pignone |
| Abstract |
Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening recommend that patients be informed about options and be able to select preferred method of screening; however, there are no existing measures available to assess whether this happens. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 22% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Psychology | 6 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 22% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2014.
All research outputs
#17,724,588
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,497
of 1,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,613
of 235,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#30
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,984 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.