↓ Skip to main content

How might we increase physical activity through dog walking?: A comprehensive review of dog walking correlates

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 2,132)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
87 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How might we increase physical activity through dog walking?: A comprehensive review of dog walking correlates
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-11-83
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carri Westgarth, Robert M Christley, Hayley E Christian

Abstract

Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are major threats to population health. A considerable proportion of people own dogs, and there is good evidence that dog ownership is associated with higher levels of physical activity. However not all owners walk their dogs regularly. This paper comprehensively reviews the evidence for correlates of dog walking so that effective interventions may be designed to increase the physical activity of dog owners.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 262 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 20%
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Researcher 26 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Other 59 22%
Unknown 53 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 30 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 9%
Psychology 24 9%
Social Sciences 23 9%
Other 77 29%
Unknown 60 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 240. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#158,975
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#35
of 2,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,261
of 247,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.