You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Determinants of modern family planning use among women of reproductive age in the Nkwanta district of Ghana: a case–control study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Reproductive Health, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1742-4755-11-65 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sebastian Eliason, John K Awoonor-Williams, Cecilia Eliason, Jacob Novignon, Justice Nonvignon, Moses Aikins |
Abstract |
Average contraceptive prevalence rate in the Nkwanta district of Ghana was estimated to be 6.2% relative to the national average at the time, of 19%. While several efforts had been made to improve family planning in the country, the district still had very low use of modern family planning methods. This study sought to determine the factors that influenced modern family planning use in general and specifically, the factors that determined the consistently low use of modern family planning methods in the district. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 29% |
South Africa | 1 | 14% |
Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 611 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 607 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 163 | 27% |
Student > Bachelor | 89 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 42 | 7% |
Researcher | 41 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 4% |
Other | 81 | 13% |
Unknown | 170 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 140 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 132 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 60 | 10% |
Unspecified | 14 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 2% |
Other | 73 | 12% |
Unknown | 179 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,042,223
of 23,337,345 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#788
of 1,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,928
of 232,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#27
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,337,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.