You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence of low back pain by anatomic location and intensity in an occupational population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-283 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew S Thiese, Kurt T Hegmann, Eric M Wood, Arun Garg, J Steven Moore, Jay Kapellusch, James Foster, Ulrike Ott |
| Abstract |
Low Back Pain (LBP) is a common and costly problem, with variation in prevalence. Epidemiological reports of rating of pain intensity and location within the low back area are rare. The objective is to describe LBP in a large, multi-center, occupational cohort detailing both point and 1-month period prevalence of LBP by location and intensity measures at baseline. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 11% |
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 86% |
| Scientists | 6 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Paraguay | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 175 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 54 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 63 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#957,811
of 25,372,398 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#127
of 4,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,452
of 247,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#6
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,372,398 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.