↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of low back pain by anatomic location and intensity in an occupational population

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of low back pain by anatomic location and intensity in an occupational population
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-283
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew S Thiese, Kurt T Hegmann, Eric M Wood, Arun Garg, J Steven Moore, Jay Kapellusch, James Foster, Ulrike Ott

Abstract

Low Back Pain (LBP) is a common and costly problem, with variation in prevalence. Epidemiological reports of rating of pain intensity and location within the low back area are rare. The objective is to describe LBP in a large, multi-center, occupational cohort detailing both point and 1-month period prevalence of LBP by location and intensity measures at baseline.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Paraguay 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 146 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Postgraduate 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 33 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 23%
Sports and Recreations 8 5%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 39 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,162,521
of 19,835,362 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#957
of 3,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,282
of 211,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,835,362 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them