↓ Skip to main content

Establishment and analysis of a reference transcriptome for Spodoptera frugiperda

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Establishment and analysis of a reference transcriptome for Spodoptera frugiperda
Published in
BMC Genomics, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-704
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabrice Legeai, Sylvie Gimenez, Bernard Duvic, Jean-Michel Escoubas, Anne-Sophie Gosselin Grenet, Florence Blanc, François Cousserans, Imène Séninet, Anthony Bretaudeau, Doriane Mutuel, Pierre-Alain Girard, Christelle Monsempes, Ghislaine Magdelenat, Frédérique Hilliou, René Feyereisen, Mylène Ogliastro, Anne-Nathalie Volkoff, Emmanuelle Jacquin-Joly, Emmanuelle d’Alençon, Nicolas Nègre, Philippe Fournier

Abstract

Spodoptera frugiperda (Noctuidae) is a major agricultural pest throughout the American continent. The highly polyphagous larvae are frequently devastating crops of importance such as corn, sorghum, cotton and grass. In addition, the Sf9 cell line, widely used in biochemistry for in vitro protein production, is derived from S. frugiperda tissues. Many research groups are using S. frugiperda as a model organism to investigate questions such as plant adaptation, pest behavior or resistance to pesticides.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 96 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 20%
Student > Master 11 11%
Other 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 12%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2015.
All research outputs
#6,272,839
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,730
of 10,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,906
of 235,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#47
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,638 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.