↓ Skip to main content

Impact of different surgical and postoperative adjuvant treatment modalities on survival of sinonasal malignant melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of different surgical and postoperative adjuvant treatment modalities on survival of sinonasal malignant melanoma
Published in
BMC Cancer, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-608
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin-Jun Meng, Hua-Fei Ao, Wei-Ting Huang, Fu Chen, Xi-Cai Sun, Jing-Jing Wang, Zhuo-Fu Liu, Wade W Han, Allison N Fry, De-Hui Wang

Abstract

The role of postoperative adjuvant treatment for sinonasal malignant melanoma remains unclear. This study evaluates the impact of three different surgical and postoperative adjuvant treatment modalities: surgery alone(open and endoscopic approaches), surgery plus radiotherapy and surgery, radiotherapy plus chemotherapy on survival of patients with primary sinonasal malignant melanoma (SMM).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 59%
Unspecified 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2014.
All research outputs
#18,376,056
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,418
of 8,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,021
of 235,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#111
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,277 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.