↓ Skip to main content

Mindfulness-based interventions in multiple sclerosis: beneficial effects of Tai Chi on balance, coordination, fatigue and depression

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
415 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mindfulness-based interventions in multiple sclerosis: beneficial effects of Tai Chi on balance, coordination, fatigue and depression
Published in
BMC Neurology, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12883-014-0165-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janina M Burschka, Philipp M Keune, Ulrich Hofstadt-van Oy, Patrick Oschmann, Peter Kuhn

Abstract

Patients suffering from Multiple Sclerosis (MS) experience a wide array of symptoms, including balance problems, mobility impairment, fatigue and depression. Physical exercise has recently been acknowledged as a treatment option complementary to medication. However, information regarding putative effects of structured exercise programs on neurological symptoms is sparse. Tai Chi, a Chinese martial art incorporating physical exercise and mindfulness training, has been shown to yield health benefits in various neurological groups. It seems particularly suitable for patients with motoric deficits as it challenges coordination and balance. The purpose of the current study was to explore the therapeutic value of structured Tai Chi training for coordination, balance, fatigue and depression in mildly disabled MS patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 415 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 407 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 65 16%
Student > Master 55 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 11%
Researcher 37 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 9%
Other 63 15%
Unknown 114 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 20%
Psychology 68 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 9%
Sports and Recreations 34 8%
Neuroscience 16 4%
Other 47 11%
Unknown 127 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,065,569
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#193
of 2,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,563
of 235,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#3
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.