You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of the natural environment on the promotion of active living: An integrative systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-873 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giovanna Calogiuri, Stiliani Chroni |
| Abstract |
An understanding of how the living environment influences physical activity (PA) is of great importance for health promotion. Researchers have reported increased PA when there is a greater availability of nature within people's living environment. However, little has been said about underlying motivational processes. The aim of this study was to review the existing literature on the relationship between the natural environment (NE) and PA, integrating it into a conceptual model that depicts the motivational process underlying this relationship. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 12% |
| Spain | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Ireland | 2 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 74% |
| Scientists | 5 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 302 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 51 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 15% |
| Researcher | 38 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 60 | 19% |
| Unknown | 67 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 40 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 12% |
| Psychology | 32 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 67 | 21% |
| Unknown | 81 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,197,714
of 25,362,919 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,350
of 17,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,998
of 247,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#25
of 288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,362,919 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.