↓ Skip to main content

Functional genomic analysis of constitutive and inducible defense responses to Fusarium verticillioides infection in maize genotypes with contrasting ear rot resistance

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional genomic analysis of constitutive and inducible defense responses to Fusarium verticillioides infection in maize genotypes with contrasting ear rot resistance
Published in
BMC Genomics, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-710
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandra Lanubile, Alberto Ferrarini, Valentina Maschietto, Massimo Delledonne, Adriano Marocco, Diana Bellin

Abstract

Fusarium verticillioides causes ear rot in maize (Zea mays L.) and accumulation of mycotoxins, that affect human and animal health. Currently, chemical and agronomic measures to control Fusarium ear rot are not very effective and selection of more resistant genotypes is a desirable strategy to reduce contaminations. A deeper knowledge of molecular events and genetic basis underlying Fusarium ear rot is necessary to speed up progress in breeding for resistance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 153 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 22%
Researcher 28 18%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 34 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 35 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2015.
All research outputs
#18,376,927
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#8,168
of 10,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,132
of 235,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#138
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,638 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.