↓ Skip to main content

No indication for tissue tropism in urogenital and anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis infections using high-resolution multilocus sequence typing

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
No indication for tissue tropism in urogenital and anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis infections using high-resolution multilocus sequence typing
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-464
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bart Versteeg, Martijn S van Rooijen, Maarten F Schim van der Loeff, Henry JC de Vries, Sylvia M Bruisten

Abstract

Previous studies showed that C. trachomatis strains found in MSM are different from those in heterosexuals. This study investigates whether the differences in strain distribution between MSM and heterosexuals are due to tissue tropism.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 17%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2014.
All research outputs
#16,606,562
of 21,326,395 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,749
of 7,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,085
of 214,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#18
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,326,395 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.