↓ Skip to main content

Preference for cesarean section in young nulligravid women in eight OECD countries and implications for reproductive health education

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 1,594)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preference for cesarean section in young nulligravid women in eight OECD countries and implications for reproductive health education
Published in
Reproductive Health, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12978-017-0354-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathrin H. Stoll, Yvonne L. Hauck, Soo Downe, Deborah Payne, Wendy A. Hall, International Childbirth Attitudes- Prior to Pregnancy (ICAPP) Study Team

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 225 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 13%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Researcher 20 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 81 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 43 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 18%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Psychology 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 92 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2017.
All research outputs
#558,272
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#32
of 1,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,578
of 327,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.