↓ Skip to main content

Automatic sleep staging using ear-EEG

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 857)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automatic sleep staging using ear-EEG
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12938-017-0400-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaare B. Mikkelsen, David Bové Villadsen, Marit Otto, Preben Kidmose

Abstract

Sleep and sleep quality assessment by means of sleep stage analysis is important for both scientific and clinical applications. Unfortunately, the presently preferred method, polysomnography (PSG), requires considerable expert assistance and significantly affects the sleep of the person under observation. A reliable, accurate and mobile alternative to the PSG would make sleep information much more readily available in a wide range of medical circumstances. Using an already proven method, ear-EEG, in which electrodes are placed inside the concha and ear canal, we measure cerebral activity and automatically score the sleep into up to five stages. These results are compared to manual scoring by trained clinicians, based on a simultaneously recorded PSG. The correspondence between manually scored sleep, based on the PSG, and the automatic labelling, based on ear-EEG data, was evaluated using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Kappa values are in the range 0.5-0.8, making ear-EEG relevant for both scientific and clinical applications. Furthermore, a sleep-wake classifier with leave-one-out cross validation yielded specificity of 0.94 and sensitivity of 0.52 for the sleep stage. Ear-EEG based scoring has clear advantages when compared to both the PSG and other mobile solutions, such as actigraphs. It is far more mobile, and potentially cheaper than the PSG, and the information on sleep stages is far superior to a wrist-based actigraph, or other devices based solely on body movement. This study shows that ear-EEG recordings carry information about sleep stages, and indicates that automatic sleep staging based on ear-EEG can classify sleep stages with a level of accuracy that makes it relevant for both scientific and clinical sleep assessment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 132 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 16%
Student > Master 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 36 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 26 20%
Neuroscience 21 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 8%
Computer Science 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 49 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,798,783
of 24,826,104 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#32
of 857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,750
of 323,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,826,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.