You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Whole plant extracts versus single compounds for the treatment of malaria: synergy and positive interactions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-10-s1-s4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Philippe Rasoanaivo, Colin W Wright, Merlin L Willcox, Ben Gilbert |
Abstract |
In traditional medicine whole plants or mixtures of plants are used rather than isolated compounds. There is evidence that crude plant extracts often have greater in vitro or/and in vivo antiplasmodial activity than isolated constituents at an equivalent dose. The aim of this paper is to review positive interactions between components of whole plant extracts, which may explain this. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 537 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 3 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 523 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 88 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 71 | 13% |
Student > Master | 68 | 13% |
Researcher | 44 | 8% |
Lecturer | 32 | 6% |
Other | 114 | 21% |
Unknown | 120 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 112 | 21% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 64 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 47 | 9% |
Chemistry | 45 | 8% |
Other | 66 | 12% |
Unknown | 148 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,511,322
of 25,349,035 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,027
of 5,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,200
of 114,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#12
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,349,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.