↓ Skip to main content

“If there’s no stability around them”: experienced therapists’ view on the role of patients’ social world in recovery in bipolar disorder

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Systems, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“If there’s no stability around them”: experienced therapists’ view on the role of patients’ social world in recovery in bipolar disorder
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13033-017-0166-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marius Veseth, Per-Einar Binder, Signe Hjelen Stige

Abstract

Recovery in severe mental illness has traditionally been described as a deeply personal process. At the same time, researchers are increasingly attending to the social nature of such processes. In this article, we aim to supplement the growing knowledge base regarding these social aspects by exploring the perspectives of experienced therapists: how do they view the role of the social world in processes of healing and growth for people with bipolar disorder? And in what ways can the social world impede recovery? We conducted 12 semi-structured individual interviews and analyzed the resulting transcripts using a team-based thematic analysis method. We identified three themes: (a) establishing a sense of belonging; (b) backing ongoing therapy; and (c) relational ripple effects. We relate our findings to existing theory and research, discuss clinical implications, and highlight study limitations. We argue that our findings underscore the need to integrate an understanding of recovery as a personal and social process in the mental health care services that we provide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2017.
All research outputs
#18,572,036
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#611
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,220
of 318,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.