↓ Skip to main content

Comparisons of intensity-duration patterns of physical activity in the US, Jamaica and 3 African countries

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparisons of intensity-duration patterns of physical activity in the US, Jamaica and 3 African countries
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-882
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lara R Dugas, Pascal Bovet, Terrence E Forrester, Estelle V Lambert, Jacob Plange-Rhule, Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu, David Shoham, Jacolene Kroff, Guichan Cao, Richard S Cooper, Soren Brage, Ulf Ekelund, Amy Luke

Abstract

This difference in how populations living in low-, middle or upper-income countries accumulate daily PA, i.e. patterns and intensity, is an important part in addressing the global PA movement. We sought to characterize objective PA in 2,500 participants spanning the epidemiologic transition. The Modeling the Epidemiologic Transition Study (METS) is a longitudinal study, in 5 countries. METS seeks to define the association between physical activity (PA), obesity and CVD risk in populations of African origin: Ghana (GH), South Africa (SA), Seychelles (SEY), Jamaica (JA) and the US (suburban Chicago).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 93 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Lecturer 9 9%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 6 6%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 23 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 15%
Social Sciences 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 27 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,304,580
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,318
of 14,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,467
of 236,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#228
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.