You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of novel candidate disease genes from de novo exonic copy number variants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Medicine, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13073-017-0472-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomasz Gambin, Bo Yuan, Weimin Bi, Pengfei Liu, Jill A. Rosenfeld, Zeynep Coban-Akdemir, Amber N. Pursley, Sandesh C. S. Nagamani, Ronit Marom, Sailaja Golla, Lauren Dengle, Heather G. Petrie, Reuben Matalon, Lisa Emrick, Monica B. Proud, Diane Treadwell-Deering, Hsiao-Tuan Chao, Hannele Koillinen, Chester Brown, Nora Urraca, Roya Mostafavi, Saunder Bernes, Elizabeth R. Roeder, Kimberly M. Nugent, Patricia I. Bader, Gary Bellus, Michael Cummings, Hope Northrup, Myla Ashfaq, Rachel Westman, Robert Wildin, Anita E. Beck, LaDonna Immken, Lindsay Elton, Shaun Varghese, Edward Buchanan, Laurence Faivre, Mathilde Lefebvre, Christian P. Schaaf, Magdalena Walkiewicz, Yaping Yang, Sung-Hae L. Kang, Seema R. Lalani, Carlos A. Bacino, Arthur L. Beaudet, Amy M. Breman, Janice L. Smith, Sau Wai Cheung, James R. Lupski, Ankita Patel, Chad A. Shaw, Paweł Stankiewicz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Poland | 2 | 9% |
| Israel | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,694,980
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#611
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,612
of 329,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.