↓ Skip to main content

Osteopathic manipulative treatment for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 4,420)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
114 X users
facebook
61 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
595 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Osteopathic manipulative treatment for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-286
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helge Franke, Jan-David Franke, Gary Fryer

Abstract

Nonspecific back pain is common, disabling, and costly. Therefore, we assessed effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in the management of nonspecific low back pain (LBP) regarding pain and functional status.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 114 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 595 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 593 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 103 17%
Student > Bachelor 88 15%
Student > Postgraduate 40 7%
Researcher 37 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 6%
Other 90 15%
Unknown 201 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 193 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 112 19%
Sports and Recreations 15 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 2%
Neuroscience 11 2%
Other 37 6%
Unknown 216 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2024.
All research outputs
#377,006
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#30
of 4,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,371
of 247,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.