↓ Skip to main content

Exploring sex differences in drug use, health and service use characteristics among young urban crack users in Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring sex differences in drug use, health and service use characteristics among young urban crack users in Brazil
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12939-014-0070-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neilane Bertoni, Chantal Burnett, Marcelo Santos Cruz, Tarcisio Andrade, Francisco I Bastos, Erotildes Leal, Benedikt Fischer

Abstract

Studies have shown important gender differences among drug (including crack) users related to: drug use patterns; health risks and consequences; criminal involvement; and service needs/use. Crack use is prevalent in Brazil; however, few comparative data by sex exist. We examined and compared by sex key drug use, health, socio-economic indicators and service use in a bi-city sample of young (18-24 years), regular and marginalized crack users in Brazil.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Unknown 160 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 46 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 17%
Psychology 19 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 55 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,965,713
of 23,798,792 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#902
of 2,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,500
of 238,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#12
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,798,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.