You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of meaning-centered group psychotherapy in cancer survivors: protocol of a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-14-22 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadia van der Spek, Joël Vos, Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan, William Breitbart, Pim Cuijpers, Kitty Knipscheer-Kuipers, Vincent Willemsen, Rob AEM Tollenaar, Christi J van Asperen, Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw |
| Abstract |
Meaning-focused coping may be at the core of adequate adjustment to life after cancer. Cancer survivors who experience their life as meaningful are better adjusted, have better quality of life and psychological functioning. Meaning-Centered Group Psychotherapy for Cancer Survivors (MCGP-CS) was designed to help patients to sustain or enhance a sense of meaning and purpose in their lives. The aim of the proposed study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MCGP-CS. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 16% |
| Researcher | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 20% |
| Unknown | 33 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 82 | 43% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 42 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2016.
All research outputs
#924,658
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#236
of 4,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,195
of 307,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#2
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.