↓ Skip to main content

Adolescent standing postural response to backpack loads: a randomised controlled experimental study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adolescent standing postural response to backpack loads: a randomised controlled experimental study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2002
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-3-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Grimmer, Brenton Dansie, Steve Milanese, Ubon Pirunsan, Patricia Trott

Abstract

Backpack loads produce changes in standing posture when compared with unloaded posture. Although 'poor' unloaded standing posture has been related to spinal pain, there is little evidence of whether, and how much, exposure to posterior load produces injurious effects on spinal tissue. The objective of this study was to describe the effect on adolescent sagittal plane standing posture of different loads and positions of a common design of school backpack. The underlying study aim was to test the appropriateness of two adult 'rules-of-thumb'-that for postural efficiency, backpacks should be worn high on the spine, and loads should be limited to 10% of body weight.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Libya 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 172 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 23%
Student > Bachelor 38 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Researcher 10 6%
Professor 7 4%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 34 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 27%
Sports and Recreations 28 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Engineering 20 11%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 41 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2014.
All research outputs
#14,200,249
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,120
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,018
of 121,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.