↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial of dietary supplementation on cognitive and immune functioning in healthy older adults

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial of dietary supplementation on cognitive and immune functioning in healthy older adults
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-14-332
Pubmed ID
Authors

John E Lewis, Angelica B Melillo, Eduard Tiozzo, Lawrence Chen, Susanna Leonard, Mark Howell, Janelle Diaz, Kathy Gonzalez, Judi M Woolger, Janet Konefal, Elaine Paterson, David Barnes

Abstract

Correction article - I am entering text here as a placeholder for the submission. Please ensure that it is removed prior to publication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%
Social Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2014.
All research outputs
#18,378,085
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#2,503
of 3,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,487
of 237,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#81
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.