You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Introducing an integrated intermediate care unit improves ICU utilization: a prospective intervention study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2253-14-76 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Barbara CJ Solberg, Carmen D Dirksen, Fred HM Nieman, Godefridus van Merode, Graham Ramsay, Paul Roekaerts, Martijn Poeze |
Abstract |
Improvement of appropriate bed use and access to intensive care (ICU) beds is essential in optimizing utilization of ICU capacity. The introduction of an intermediate care unit (IMC) integrated in the ICU care may improve this utilization. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 86 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 18% |
Researcher | 13 | 15% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
Professor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 20% |
Unknown | 23 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 23 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2014.
All research outputs
#14,916,267
of 23,860,205 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#563
of 1,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,736
of 241,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,860,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,573 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.