↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and correlates of cytopenias in HIV-infected adults initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy in Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and correlates of cytopenias in HIV-infected adults initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy in Uganda
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-496
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Kyeyune, Elmar Saathoff, Amara E Ezeamama, Thomas Löscher, Wafaie Fawzi, David Guwatudde

Abstract

Cytopenias are the most common HIV-associated hematological abnormality. Cytopenias have been associated with several factors including sex, race/ethnicity, geographical location and comorbidities such as tuberculosis, hepatitis B infection, fever and oral candidiasis. Cytopenias become more prevalent as HIV progresses and are often fatal. Data from resource-limited settings about the prevalence and correlates of cytopenia are limited. Therefore we conducted this cross-sectional study to assess the prevalence and correlates of cytopenia among adult AIDS patients at initiation of HAART in Uganda.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
Unknown 171 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 19%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Lecturer 13 8%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 54 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 62 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2014.
All research outputs
#13,412,618
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,338
of 7,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,235
of 238,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#64
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.