↓ Skip to main content

The effect of methylphenidate on neurofibromatosis type 1: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of methylphenidate on neurofibromatosis type 1: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13023-014-0142-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurence Lion-François, François Gueyffier, Catherine Mercier, Daniel Gérard, Vania Herbillon, Isabelle Kemlin, Diana Rodriguez, Tiphanie Ginhoux, Emeline Peyric, Virginie Coutinho, Valentine Bréant, Vincent des Portes, Stéphane Pinson, Patrick Combemale, Behrouz Kassaï, et Réseau NF1 Rhône Alpes Auvergne-France

Abstract

BackgroundNeurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant disorder with an estimated prevalence of about 1/3000, independent of ethnicity, race, or gender. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity like Disorder (ADHD)-like characteristics are often reported in patients with NF1. We hypothesised that learning disabilities in NF1 children were related to ADHD symptoms. Treatment with methylphenidate (MPD) has improved learning disabilities in ADHD by acting on neurotransmitters. Our objective was to evaluate its efficacy on ADHD-like symptoms in neurofibromatosis type 1 children (7¿12 years).MethodsThis was a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, and crossover trial comparing 0.5 to 0.8 mg/kg/d of MPD as it is indicated for ADHD to placebo in NF1 children with ADHD-like symptoms. Children aged 7 to 12 years were eligible when their IQ was between 80 and 120. The total follow-up was 9 weeks including 4 weeks for each period and 1 week wash out. Fifty subjects (25 for each period) were required for testing the primary study hypothesis. The main outcome was an improvement in scores on the simplified Conners¿ Parent Rating Scale.ResultsThirty-nine patients were included between April 2004 and December 2010. Twenty participants received MPD and 19 placebo during the first period. They all completed the trial. MPD decreased the simplified Conners by 3.9 points (±1.1, p¿=¿0. 0003).ConclusionsThis is the first randomised controlled trial showing the short-term benefit of MPD on simplified Conners scores in NF1 children.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00169611.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 22%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 24 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 27 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,905,676
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#389
of 3,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,798
of 250,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#6
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.