↓ Skip to main content

Proposed guidelines for the diagnosis and management of methylmalonic and propionic acidemia

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
519 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
573 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Proposed guidelines for the diagnosis and management of methylmalonic and propionic acidemia
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13023-014-0130-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthias R Baumgartner, Friederike Hörster, Carlo Dionisi-Vici, Goknur Haliloglu, Daniela Karall, Kimberly A Chapman, Martina Huemer, Michel Hochuli, Murielle Assoun, Diana Ballhausen, Alberto Burlina, Brian Fowler, Sarah C Grünert, Stephanie Grünewald, Tomas Honzik, Begoña Merinero, Celia Pérez-Cerdá, Sabine Scholl-Bürgi, Flemming Skovby, Frits Wijburg, Anita MacDonald, Diego Martinelli, Jörn Oliver Sass, Vassili Valayannopoulos, Anupam Chakrapani

Abstract

Methylmalonic and propionic acidemia (MMA/PA) are inborn errors of metabolism characterized by accumulation of propionic acid and/or methylmalonic acid due to deficiency of methylmalonyl-CoA mutase (MUT) or propionyl-CoA carboxylase (PCC). MMA has an estimated incidence of¿~¿1: 50,000 and PA of¿~¿1:100¿000 -150,000. Patients present either shortly after birth with acute deterioration, metabolic acidosis and hyperammonemia or later at any age with a more heterogeneous clinical picture, leading to early death or to severe neurological handicap in many survivors. Mental outcome tends to be worse in PA and late complications include chronic kidney disease almost exclusively in MMA and cardiomyopathy mainly in PA. Except for vitamin B12 responsive forms of MMA the outcome remains poor despite the existence of apparently effective therapy with a low protein diet and carnitine. This may be related to under recognition and delayed diagnosis due to nonspecific clinical presentation and insufficient awareness of health care professionals because of disease rarity.These guidelines aim to provide a trans-European consensus to guide practitioners, set standards of care and to help to raise awareness. To achieve these goals, the guidelines were developed using the SIGN methodology by having professionals on MMA/PA across twelve European countries and the U.S. gather all the existing evidence, score it according to the SIGN evidence level system and make a series of conclusive statements supported by an associated level of evidence. Although the degree of evidence rarely exceeds level C (evidence from non-analytical studies like case reports and series), the guideline should provide a firm and critical basis to guide practice on both acute and chronic presentations, and to address diagnosis, management, monitoring, outcomes, and psychosocial and ethical issues. Furthermore, these guidelines highlight gaps in knowledge that must be filled by future research. We consider that these guidelines will help to harmonize practice, set common standards and spread good practices, with a positive impact on the outcomes of MMA/PA patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 573 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 563 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 76 13%
Student > Bachelor 73 13%
Student > Master 62 11%
Other 59 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 9%
Other 109 19%
Unknown 140 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 187 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 78 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 2%
Other 64 11%
Unknown 162 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,412,844
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#156
of 3,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,326
of 249,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.