↓ Skip to main content

The impact of structural integrity and route of administration on the antibody specificity against three cow's milk allergens ‐ a study in Brown Norway rats

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of structural integrity and route of administration on the antibody specificity against three cow's milk allergens ‐ a study in Brown Norway rats
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/2045-7022-4-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeanette Lund Madsen, Stine Kroghsbo, Charlotte Bernhard Madsen, Irina Pozdnyakova, Vibeke Barkholt, Katrine Lindholm Bøgh

Abstract

Characterisation of the specific antibody response, including the epitope binding pattern, is an essential task for understanding the molecular mechanisms of food allergy. Examination of antibody formation in a controlled environment requires animal models. The purpose of this study was to examine the amount and types of antibodies raised against three cow's milk allergens; β-lactoglobulin (BLG), α-lactalbumin (ALA) and β-casein upon oral or intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration. A special focus was given to the relative amount of antibodies raised against linear versus conformational epitopes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 14 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2020.
All research outputs
#14,772,550
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#490
of 765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,985
of 247,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.