↓ Skip to main content

Stop the pain: study protocol for a randomized-controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stop the pain: study protocol for a randomized-controlled trial
Published in
Trials, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-357
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petra Warschburger, Claudia Calvano, Sebastian Becker, Michael Friedt, Christian Hudert, Carsten Posovszky, Maike Schier, Karl Wegscheider

Abstract

Functional abdominal pain (FAP) is not only a highly prevalent disease but also poses a considerable burden on children and their families. Untreated, FAP is highly persistent until adulthood, also leading to an increased risk of psychiatric disorders. Intervention studies underscore the efficacy of cognitive behavioral treatment approaches but are limited in terms of sample size, long-term follow-up data, controls and inclusion of psychosocial outcome data.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 54 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Master 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 54 40%
Psychology 19 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 29 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2015.
All research outputs
#6,910,647
of 21,326,395 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#2,539
of 5,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,108
of 216,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,326,395 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them