↓ Skip to main content

Structural and intermediary determinants of social inequalities in the mental well-being of European workers: a relational approach

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural and intermediary determinants of social inequalities in the mental well-being of European workers: a relational approach
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-938
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah De Moortel, Hadewijch Vandenheede, Carles Muntaner, Christophe Vanroelen

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine social inequalities in employee mental well-being, using relational social class indicators. Relational social class indicators are based on theoretical insights about the mechanisms generating social (health) inequalities. Additionally, it is examined whether the psychosocial work environment and employment quality act as intermediary determinants of social class inequalities in mental well-being, simultaneously testing the mediation (differential exposure) and moderation (differential vulnerability) hypotheses.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Unknown 99 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 26 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Psychology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 31 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2014.
All research outputs
#5,819,128
of 21,326,395 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,141
of 13,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,722
of 216,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,326,395 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them