You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A transcriptome resource for the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus): insights into koala retrovirus transcription and sequence diversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-15-786 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew Hobbs, Ana Pavasovic, Andrew G King, Peter J Prentis, Mark DB Eldridge, Zhiliang Chen, Donald J Colgan, Adam Polkinghorne, Marc R Wilkins, Cheyne Flanagan, Amber Gillett, Jon Hanger, Rebecca N Johnson, Peter Timms |
| Abstract |
The koala, Phascolarctos cinereus, is a biologically unique and evolutionarily distinct Australian arboreal marsupial. The goal of this study was to sequence the transcriptome from several tissues of two geographically separate koalas, and to create the first comprehensive catalog of annotated transcripts for this species, enabling detailed analysis of the unique attributes of this threatened native marsupial, including infection by the koala retrovirus. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 35% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 12 | 46% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,103,700
of 24,187,594 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#173
of 10,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,634
of 243,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#2
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,187,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.