↓ Skip to main content

The effect of dance mat exergaming systems on physical activity and health – related outcomes in secondary schools: results from a natural experiment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
30 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of dance mat exergaming systems on physical activity and health – related outcomes in secondary schools: results from a natural experiment
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-951
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liane B Azevedo, Duika Burges Watson, Catherine Haighton, Jean Adams

Abstract

Exergaming has been proposed as an innovative method for physical activity promotion. However, large effectiveness studies are rare. In January 2011, dance mat systems were introduced in secondary schools in two districts in England with the aim of promoting an innovative opportunity for physical activity. The aim of this natural experiment was to examine the effect of introducing the dance mat exergaming systems on physical activity and health-related outcomes in 11-13 year old students using a non-randomised controlled design and mixed methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 295 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 16%
Student > Bachelor 39 13%
Researcher 30 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 9%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 83 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 50 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 12%
Psychology 30 10%
Social Sciences 28 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 8%
Other 31 10%
Unknown 100 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,507,551
of 25,307,332 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,679
of 16,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,553
of 250,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#29
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,307,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.