↓ Skip to main content

Heat treatment prior to testing allows detection of antigen of Dirofilaria immitis in feline serum

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
240 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heat treatment prior to testing allows detection of antigen of Dirofilaria immitis in feline serum
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-7-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan E Little, Melissa R Raymond, Jennifer E Thomas, Jeff Gruntmeir, Joe A Hostetler, James H Meinkoth, Byron L Blagburn

Abstract

Diagnosis of Dirofilaria immitis infection in cats is complicated by the difficulty associated with reliable detection of antigen in feline blood and serum samples.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
Malaysia 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 19%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 15 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2014.
All research outputs
#11,069,876
of 12,451,686 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#2,795
of 3,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,058
of 205,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#21
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,451,686 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.