↓ Skip to main content

Process evaluation design in a cluster randomised controlled childhood obesity prevention trial: the WAVES study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Process evaluation design in a cluster randomised controlled childhood obesity prevention trial: the WAVES study
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12966-014-0112-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tania L Griffin, Miranda J Pallan, Joanne L Clarke, Emma R Lancashire, Anna Lyon, Jayne M Parry, Peymane Adab

Abstract

BackgroundThe implementation of a complex intervention is heavily influenced by individual context. Variation in implementation and tailoring of the intervention to the particular context will occur, even in a trial setting. It is recognised that in trials, evaluating the process of implementation of a complex intervention is important, yet process evaluation methods are rarely reported. The WAVES study is a cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of an obesity prevention intervention programme targeting children aged 6¿7 years, delivered by teachers in primary schools across the West Midlands, UK. The intervention promoted activities encouraging physical activity and healthy eating. This paper presents the methods used to assess implementation of the intervention.MethodsPrevious literature was used to identify the dimensions of intervention process and implementation to be assessed, including adherence, exposure, quality of delivery, participant responsiveness, context, and programme differentiation.ResultsMultiple methods and tools were developed to capture information on all these dimensions. These included observations, logbooks, qualitative evaluation, questionnaires and research team reflection.DiscussionData collection posed several challenges, predominantly when relying on teachers to complete paperwork, which they saw as burdensome on top of their teaching responsibilities. However, the use of multiple methods helped to ensure data on each dimension, where possible, was collected using more than one method. This also allowed for triangulation of the findings when several data sources on any one dimension were available.ConclusionsWe have reported a comprehensive approach to the assessment of the implementation and processes of a complex childhood obesity prevention intervention within a cluster randomised controlled trial. These approaches can be transferred and adapted for use in other complex intervention trials.Trial registration number ISRCTN97000586.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Unknown 203 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 54 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 14%
Social Sciences 21 10%
Psychology 18 9%
Sports and Recreations 8 4%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 62 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,446,001
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,567
of 1,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,219
of 238,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#30
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.