↓ Skip to main content

Diet and exercise orthogonally alter the gut microbiome and reveal independent associations with anxiety and cognition

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurodegeneration, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 895)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
25 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
251 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
477 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diet and exercise orthogonally alter the gut microbiome and reveal independent associations with anxiety and cognition
Published in
Molecular Neurodegeneration, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1750-1326-9-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia S Kang, Patricio R Jeraldo, Aishe Kurti, Margret E Berg Miller, Marc D Cook, Keith Whitlock, Nigel Goldenfeld, Jeffrey A Woods, Bryan A White, Nicholas Chia, John D Fryer

Abstract

The ingestion of a high-fat diet (HFD) and the resulting obese state can exert a multitude of stressors on the individual including anxiety and cognitive dysfunction. Though many studies have shown that exercise can alleviate the negative consequences of a HFD using metabolic readouts such as insulin and glucose, a paucity of well-controlled rodent studies have been published on HFD and exercise interactions with regard to behavioral outcomes. This is a critical issue since some individuals assume that HFD-induced behavioral problems such as anxiety and cognitive dysfunction can simply be exercised away. To investigate this, we analyzed mice fed a normal diet (ND), ND with exercise, HFD diet, or HFD with exercise.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 477 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 464 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 18%
Student > Bachelor 80 17%
Researcher 61 13%
Student > Master 54 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 7%
Other 68 14%
Unknown 97 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 71 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 10%
Neuroscience 35 7%
Psychology 29 6%
Other 92 19%
Unknown 112 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2021.
All research outputs
#481,340
of 24,056,502 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#17
of 895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,855
of 249,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,056,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.