You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validation of the angular measurements of a new inertial-measurement-unit based rehabilitation system: comparison with state-of-the-art gait analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-11-136 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alberto Leardini, Giada Lullini, Sandro Giannini, Lisa Berti, Maurizio Ortolani, Paolo Caravaggi |
| Abstract |
Several rehabilitation systems based on inertial measurement units (IMU) are entering the market for the control of exercises and to measure performance progression, particularly for recovery after lower limb orthopaedic treatments. IMU are easy to wear also by the patient alone, but the extent to which IMU's malpositioning in routine use can affect the accuracy of the measurements is not known. A new such system (RiabloTM, CoRehab, Trento, Italy), using audio-visual biofeedback based on videogames, was assessed against state-of-the-art gait analysis as the gold standard. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 275 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 15% |
| Researcher | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 15% |
| Unknown | 57 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 101 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 16 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 11% |
| Unknown | 70 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#3,138,887
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#154
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,124
of 250,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.